Diagnostic Qualifier

This tool estimates whether a decision-structure diagnostic is likely to add value for your team right now. It looks for measurable signs that execution is being slowed by approval/escalation congestion, rework from late changes, delayed outcome feedback, or unclear decision ownership.

Enter a few estimates and you’ll get a High / Medium / Low diagnostic-value indicator, charts showing the underlying drivers, and an optional hours-at-risk estimate. The tool runs locally in your browser, stores nothing, and will flag “Evidence insufficient” when key inputs are missing

Decision-Structure Diagnostic Value Tool

A neutral, local-only assessment of whether a decision-structure diagnostic is likely to add value based on congestion, rework, feedback delay, and decision clarity indicators.

Inputs

Fill what you can. The tool will flag where evidence is insufficient.

Section A — Decision Flow

35%
25%

Section B — Rework & Reversals

20%

Section C — Feedback & Measurement

Used only to adjust “evidence sufficiency,” not to assume value.

Section D — Roles & Accountability

65

Section E — Context

Local-only: no data is stored or transmitted by this tool. Outputs are conditional and evidence-limited by your inputs.

Outputs

Diagnostic Value
Score: —
Congestion
Approvals / escalations / cycle time
Rework
Revisits / rework hours / reversals
Feedback Delay
Time-to-signal adjusted by clarity
Decision Clarity
Owner clarity / rights / tradeoffs

Profile (Radar)

Top Drivers (Bar)

Driver Notes (neutral, evidence-limited)

These statements describe what your inputs imply, not guarantees.

Hours-at-risk estimate (optional)

A rough hours/week estimate from delays and rework. Not a financial estimate.
Estimated rework hours / week
decisions/week × revisit% × rework hours
Estimated waiting/friction hours / week
cycle time × friction factor × decisions/week
Scoring is heuristic and transparent. A “High” result means “inputs suggest congestion/rework/feedback issues are large enough that structure-focused diagnosis is plausibly informative.”